<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>DomainerPro.com &#187; Registering Domains</title>
	<atom:link href="http://domainerpro.com/category/registering-domains/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://domainerpro.com</link>
	<description>Making Money With Domain Names</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2011 19:36:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Dreaming InTheMiddleOfTheNight.com</title>
		<link>http://domainerpro.com/dreaming-inthemiddleofthenightcom/</link>
		<comments>http://domainerpro.com/dreaming-inthemiddleofthenightcom/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 18:30:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>W.H.A.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Registering Domains]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainerpro.com/dreaming-inthemiddleofthenightcom/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I had a dream that I wanted to register a domain name for a company that provided round-the-clock network security and emergency response. I walked into a domain registry company owned by Tom Hanks, the actor. In my dream, Tom was a charismatic, well known figure in the domain name industry, kind of like Bob [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.domainerpro.com/wp-content/images/beach8b.jpg" title="Dreaming domain names" alt="dreaming InTheMiddleOfTheNight.com" border="0" height="150" hspace="0" vspace="0" width="500" /></p>
<p>I had a dream that I wanted to register a domain name for a company that provided round-the-clock network security and emergency response.</p>
<p>I walked into a domain registry company owned by Tom Hanks, the actor. In my dream, Tom was a charismatic, well known figure in the domain name industry, kind of like Bob Parsons. Tom was famous for his incredible energy and customer service, and since I was a well known domainer he attended to me personally.</p>
<p>Tom met me decked out in a sleek, dark suit, with gleaming black shoes and sporting a goatee. He took me into an air conditioned circular chamber with large flat screen monitors on the walls. There was a smell of ozone in the air.</p>
<p>Tom shot a series of rapid fire questions at me, designed to discover the perfect domain name. As I answered the questions a technician in a glass-walled booth typed furiously, and domain names began flashing across the monitors. With each question I answered the number of domains on the screens diminished, until at last only one phrase glowed on the largest screen:</p>
<p><strong>midday</strong></p>
<p>&#8220;Dot what?&#8221; I asked.</p>
<p>&#8220;Dot com!&#8221; Tom shouted exultantly.</p>
<p>&#8220;I´ll take it,&#8221; I said.</p>
<p>&#8220;Sold!&#8221; Tom crowed, then he turned on his heel and walked away.</p>
<p>I thought to myself, <em>How could midday.com still be available?</em> Sure enough, the technician spoke up:</p>
<p>&#8220;Actually, it´s dot org.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;I´ll take it anyway as an investment,&#8221; I said, &#8220;but I still need something for my business.&#8221;</p>
<p>With the technician´s help I tried a few alternatives, such as <em>midnight.com</em> &#8211; I liked this one as it conveys the sense that we, the network emergency response team, are up at all hours, ready to go. But of course it was taken.</p>
<p>Tom wandered back and saw that I had not yet found the right domain name.</p>
<p>&#8220;I can´t leave a customer unsatisfied,&#8221; he exclaimed. &#8220;Tell you what I´m going to do. I will give you &#8211; that´s right, give you &#8211; <em>TomJHanks.com</em>, my own name!&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Thanks Tom,&#8221; I said, &#8220;It´s a nice gesture, but it really doesn´t pertain to network security, does it?&#8221;</p>
<p>Tom didn&#8217;t like that and left in a huff.</p>
<p>The techie and I tried a few other variations and eventually I settled on <a href="http://www.inthemiddleofthenight.com" title="InTheMiddleOfTheNight.com domain name" target="_blank"><em><strong>InTheMiddleOfTheNight.com</strong></em></a>.</p>
<p>I was quite happy with it and when I woke up from the dream &#8211; yes, real life now &#8211; I logged into my Moniker account and registered it. Yes, I know it´s six words and long as a garden hose, but it´s got a certain feel to it. You can almost see the network techs sitting before shining monitors in the dark of the night, hard at work. Problem is, I don´t really have a network security firm as a client.</p>
<p>Ah well, if it doesn´t work out maybe I can sell it to a Hollywood studio for a horror flick.</p>
<p>P.S. <em>TomJHanks.com</em> is available as of this writing. Help yourself. That really is his middle initial.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://domainerpro.com/dreaming-inthemiddleofthenightcom/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Domain Tasting for the Little Guy</title>
		<link>http://domainerpro.com/domain-tasting-for-the-little-guy/</link>
		<comments>http://domainerpro.com/domain-tasting-for-the-little-guy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 16:20:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>W.H.A.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Advice for Beginners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domain Tasting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Registering Domains]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainerpro.com/domain-tasting-for-the-little-guy/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My recent article, &#8220;How to Find Great Domain Names: 12 Super Tips&#8221; has proved enormously popular and has received thousands of views. In one part of the article I wrote, &#8220;Ignore trends that may have a cult following but are not widely known. For example, I recently read about a new trend among photography hobbyists [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.domainerpro.com/wp-content/images/beach2b.jpg" title="domain name tasting" alt="domaining ebook" border="0" height="150" hspace="0" vspace="0" width="500" /></p>
<p>My recent article, <a href="http://domainerpro.com/how-to-find-great-domain-names/" title="How to find great domain names">&#8220;How to Find Great Domain Names: 12 Super Tips&#8221;</a> has proved enormously popular and has received thousands of views.</p>
<p>In one part of the article I wrote, &#8220;Ignore trends that may have a cult following but are not widely known. For example, I recently read about a new trend among photography hobbyists called lomography. I tasted several domains related to this trend but found that they got no traffic, so I let them drop. Instead look for trends that have the potential to be huge.&#8221;</p>
<p>One of my readers, &#8220;woolwit,&#8221; was intrigued by the mention of domain tasting and asked the following question:</p>
<p><em>&#8220;Excellent article and a great reference for creative domaining. You mention domain tasting in the article. I’ve always assumed that it was only the big bulk domainers who had access to domain tasting. Would you consider writing a short How-To taste domains for the rest of us? I’ve looked around on GoDaddy and not found anything. Can you recommend a registrar who makes tasting available one domain at a time?&#8221;</em></p>
<p>At the risk of sounding like a hypocrite, let me say first that I&#8217;m opposed to domain tasting. The big tasting companies use automated scripts and sneaky tactics of all kinds to taste domains by the millions, keeping the ones that make a few pennies and throwing the rest back. They&#8217;re very secretive about ownership and are generally located offshore. I think it&#8217;s bad for the industry and unfair to individual domainers, and I&#8217;m in favor of abolishing it altogether. In particular the practice of churning vast numbers of domains but registering none, keeping them in an endless trial period loop, is disgusting.</p>
<p>Until that day comes, however, I do make use of domain tasting on a small scale. I&#8217;m talking one or two domains at a time. I think that tasting in this manner is a reasonable way for a domainer with a limited budget to try out ideas without racking up a big credit card bill.</p>
<p>Last year I did a lot of searching, trying to find an affordable tasting solution for the little guy, and I finally found <a href="http://www.TastingGenie.com" title="TastingGenie domain name tasting service" target="_blank">TastingGenie</a>, which bills itself as &#8220;Domain tasting for the masses.&#8221; It&#8217;s run by a registrar called <a href="http://www.MindGenies.com" title="MindGenies domain registrar" target="_blank">MindGenies</a>.</p>
<p>By the way, this is not an affiliate link or paid post. I don&#8217;t get anything for recommending them. I&#8217;m simply helping out my readers.</p>
<p>At TastingGenie you pay $100 up front to set up an account. They have sort of a complicated pricing scheme with different plans to choose from, but what it basically amounts to is that you pay as little as 7 cents per domain to taste. They are partnered with<a href="http://www.DomainSponsor.com" title="DomainSponsor domain parking" target="_blank"> DomainSponsor.com</a>, you&#8217;ll need an account there. Each domain that you taste is automatically configured with DomainSponsor&#8217;s nameservers, and you then go to your DomainSponsor account and add the domain.</p>
<p>The tasting period is 4.5 days. If you do nothing, TastingGenie will automatically drop the domain name. If you want to keep it, you must log in to your TastingGenie account and select the domain name to keep. At that point it will be registered at MindGenies for $7.25. That money will be taken out of your $100 credit that you started with.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been satisfied with TastingGenie&#8217;s service and I think it&#8217;s a good way to try out a few domain ideas every now and then without ending up with a lot of useless no-traffic domain names.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://domainerpro.com/domain-tasting-for-the-little-guy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Free Domain Names, and the Question of Advertorials</title>
		<link>http://domainerpro.com/free-domain-names/</link>
		<comments>http://domainerpro.com/free-domain-names/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2007 23:59:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>W.H.A.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Registering Domains]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainerpro.com/free-domain-names/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A certain domain name blogger wrote a recent post titled, "Register a FREE domain name!" in which he mentions a service called DomainLagoon.com that gives you points for filling out web surveys, and then allows you to trade those points for a domain name registration. Is his recommendation objective, or is it an "advertorial"?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.domainerpro.com/wp-content/images/beach2b.jpg" title="Free domain names" alt="Free domain names" border="0" height="150" hspace="0" vspace="0" width="500" /></p>
<p>A certain domain name blogger wrote a recent post titled, &#8220;Register a FREE domain name!&#8221; in which he mentions a service called DomainLagoon.com that gives you points for filling out web surveys, and then allows you to trade those points for a domain name registration. But is it really worth your time?</p>
<p><span id="more-52"></span></p>
<p>The blogger writes, <em>&#8220;It took me about 2 hours to fill out enough web offers to earn enough points for my first free domain. (9.95 points)&#8230;. What are you waiting for? Click the banner and get your free domain!&#8221;</em></p>
<p>The problem with this is that I can register a domain name for $8, so if it took the blogger two hours to fill out enough surveys to register one domain, then he is working for $4 per hour, below the U.S. minimum wage. I value my time far too much for that, and I can think of more productive ways to use two hours of my time online.</p>
<p>Secondly, I can see that the link on the blog is an affiliate link, and for all I know it&#8217;s a paid post as well, which means that his enthusiasm must be taken with a grain of salt.</p>
<p>Still, I&#8217;d say it&#8217;s a good offer for someone who perhaps lives in a poor country, has no job and no funds, and wants to try his hand with a few domain names. Also, the Domain Lagoon system requires no credit card, so it might be handy for someone with no credit card who wants to get started in domaining. If you register a reasonably good two or three word dot com, you might be able to flip it for several times the reg fee, and then you&#8217;re on your way, even if it&#8217;s a slow start.</p>
<p>By the way, there are no &#8220;advertorials&#8221; or paid posts on DomainerPro.com. I do have a few Adsense ads running, and I may in the future place advertisments for domain parking services or registrars, but they will clearly be ads. I will not hide affiliate links within blog posts. If I say good things about a company or product it&#8217;s because I genuinely appreciate it, not because I&#8217;m getting paid.</p>
<p>I do frequently mention services like Sedo.com, Moniker.com, DomainSponsor.com, etc, and I could probably make a few bucks by placing my affiliate code in the links, but that would compromise my objectivity. When you&#8217;re promoting a service because you get paid to do so, your opinion is no longer credible. Failing to disclose the sponsorship is, in my opinion, bad blogging practice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://domainerpro.com/free-domain-names/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Served from: domainerpro.com @ 2012-02-05 09:17:55 by W3 Total Cache -->
